Leadership Models Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Leadership Models - Assignment useIn the 21st century and a greater part of the 19th century leaders has make out an exercise void of coercion. Scholars have in the recent past thitherfore, put forth lucrative ideas as to how one should describe leadership. The English philosopher Herbert Spencer states that society defines leadership meaning leaders and their subsequent leadership traits be a product of pre-existing, existing and future societal rules, laws and norms. Granted, this description takes into account the subjective nature of e real dynamic societies (Kellerman, 2004). Types of leadership Based on Herbert Spencers description it is imperative that there exists various make waters of leadership to satisfy the different set of societal circumstances. There are, therefore, various degrees of leadership styles that whitethorn occur in both the formal and informal setting. Discussed herein are four types of leadership Autocratic leadership bureaucratic leadership Democra tic leadership Delegative leadership Transformational leadership I) Autocratic leadership Autocratic leadership is the form of leadership where the person in major power exercises full control over individuals. Decisions are enforced by rewards and the fear of punishment. Also, communication tends to be primarily in one direction that is, from the leaders to the followers. The followers in this case have little control over matters even those very personal to them. This is because the leader allows very little or no input at all to the decisions they make (Clawson (2006). Application in fiddle setting Autocratic leadership does not provide for consultation and is, therefore, very beneficial when a couch requires quick decision-making. Such projects are usually time sensitive or of weighty ethical importee such that one grassnot afford to engage in controversial consultation. Change in society is needful but there are forces that hold it back. In a situation where quick change is needed this is the best form of leadership to adopt as it does not give room for stalling. The leader should be the close to knowledgeable member of the group in order to cement their assertiveness. However, this form of leadership can cause followers to be subject to abuse by the leader. This is because the leader has so much power on their side. Secondly societies under this form of leadership are not cohesive as there is always conflict between the followers and the leaders. Finally, progression is hindered when autocratic leadership is in play. In most cases the leader makes decisions on their own, disregarding other peoples opinions that may be more lucrative hence hinder creativity (Kellerman, 2004). II) Bureaucratic Leadership In bureaucratic leadership, the leader is keen on ensuring that followers gravel to rules, regulations and procedures in an accurate and consistent manner. This leadership style emerges from the transactional theories, which base leadership on a transcription of rewards and punishments. The leader in this case expects that followers conduct themselves in a formal manner towards all(prenominal) other and even those outside their setting. The leader has certain distinct privileges that set them apart from the rest. This feature causes this form of leadership to be big on titles and roles. Adhering to the set rules results in reward while going against them may result in punishment or exclusion. This form of leadership flourishes over long periods and is, therefore,